<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VerticalAlign for VGroup and HorizontalAlign for HGroup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evtimmy.com/2010/01/verticalalign-for-vgroup-and-horizontalalign-for-hgroup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evtimmy.com/2010/01/verticalalign-for-vgroup-and-horizontalalign-for-hgroup/</link>
	<description>Evtim on Flex SDK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:56:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: franto</title>
		<link>http://evtimmy.com/2010/01/verticalalign-for-vgroup-and-horizontalalign-for-hgroup/comment-page-1/#comment-11499</link>
		<dc:creator>franto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evtimmy.com/?p=239#comment-11499</guid>
		<description>Hey Evtim,

sorry for off-topic, can you contact me on my email (filled up, when submitting this comment). I really need to discuss with you bug http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25605 (you&#039;ve created yesterday).

Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Evtim,</p>
<p>sorry for off-topic, can you contact me on my email (filled up, when submitting this comment). I really need to discuss with you bug <a href="http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25605" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25605</a> (you&#8217;ve created yesterday).</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evtim</title>
		<link>http://evtimmy.com/2010/01/verticalalign-for-vgroup-and-horizontalalign-for-hgroup/comment-page-1/#comment-11478</link>
		<dc:creator>Evtim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evtimmy.com/?p=239#comment-11478</guid>
		<description>Hi Tink,

Thanks for the comment.  We didn&#039;t implement &quot;justify&quot; or &quot;contentJustify&quot; as for example in a VerticalLayout with such verticalAlign settings, all of the elements will be as tall as the layout container. In that case the elements should be either stacked on top of each other (and the layout would no longer make sense to be called vertical) or arranged vertically (but then they won&#039;t really be justified vertically).
Having said that, I probably don&#039;t understand your particular use case.  Perhaps setting 100% height on all of the elements and using a BasicLayout instead is what you have in mind?

Thanks,
-Evtim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tink,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  We didn&#8217;t implement &#8220;justify&#8221; or &#8220;contentJustify&#8221; as for example in a VerticalLayout with such verticalAlign settings, all of the elements will be as tall as the layout container. In that case the elements should be either stacked on top of each other (and the layout would no longer make sense to be called vertical) or arranged vertically (but then they won&#8217;t really be justified vertically).<br />
Having said that, I probably don&#8217;t understand your particular use case.  Perhaps setting 100% height on all of the elements and using a BasicLayout instead is what you have in mind?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
-Evtim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://evtimmy.com/2010/01/verticalalign-for-vgroup-and-horizontalalign-for-hgroup/comment-page-1/#comment-11475</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evtimmy.com/?p=239#comment-11475</guid>
		<description>Nice, this was really needed to avoid have to use an extra Group that implement a layout on the other axis.

Any reason why &quot;justify&quot; and &quot;contentJustify&quot; weren&#039;t also implemented?

i.e. on a VerticalLayout, &quot;justify&quot; would make all children the same height as the container, or &quot;contentJustify&quot; all children would be made the height of the largest child.

I currently don&#039;t see any errors if these unsupported values are set via AS (silently defaults back to &quot;top&quot; or &quot;left&quot;. Has this now changed and errors been added?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, this was really needed to avoid have to use an extra Group that implement a layout on the other axis.</p>
<p>Any reason why &#8220;justify&#8221; and &#8220;contentJustify&#8221; weren&#8217;t also implemented?</p>
<p>i.e. on a VerticalLayout, &#8220;justify&#8221; would make all children the same height as the container, or &#8220;contentJustify&#8221; all children would be made the height of the largest child.</p>
<p>I currently don&#8217;t see any errors if these unsupported values are set via AS (silently defaults back to &#8220;top&#8221; or &#8220;left&#8221;. Has this now changed and errors been added?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
